WTF?

How lame was the cover of Cosmopolitan this month?


I honestly have no idea why Ashlee Simpson was on there... there is nothing fun or fearless about her, plus she just recently got a new face- and it's NOT that cute. The actual article was uneventful to say the least; it was extremely boring and about 8 1/2 sentences long. I'm not blaming the poor author of this article (they probably made her do it), but rather the intellectually stale subject. This poor writer had nothing good to work from and the piece pretty much made me feel bad for the woman who sat down and tried to get real answers from Ashlee. The writer was reduced to handing her a Cosmo Quiz worksheet. It contained pretty much all the highlights (barely) of her interview including such random Ashlee facts as:

- Her favorite body part: boobs
- She feels that the statement, "you can have a good relationship without amazing sex" is both true and false.
-She feels sexiest in bed.

...among other riveting blurbs.


The reason why it irks me so much that she's on the cover is because the women on there usually have more to say and are in the media spotlight around the time of their issue. They usually describe a celebrity's philosophy on life, love, health or whatever. She isn't doing much right now besides dating that ugly guitar player in Fall Out Boy, and it seems that Ashlee here went on a prissy little ego trip during this interview talking about her hair, her boobs, and the fact that she's starting to like the beach now.

Psh! I knew what was in store when I saw that plastic nose on there. Shame on me for giving in anyway.

Disappointing Cosmo, shame on you too.

-Brokie